By Leonnel Mhuka
Senator Mafa Sibanda has raised serious concerns about the Southern African Development Community (SADC), questioning its commitment to upholding democratic principles among its member states. Speaking to Change Radio on Tuesday, Sibanda pointed out the shortcomings of the regional body, particularly in light of the recent SADC summit held in Zimbabwe. The senator’s comments come in the wake of SADC’s observer mission’s assessment of Zimbabwe’s August elections last year, which were found to be neither free nor fair, failing to meet both Zimbabwe’s constitutional requirements and SADC’s own guidelines.
Reflecting on the SADC summit, Sibanda stated, “There are many questions than answers, many issues are lingering around, whether this regional body is worthy its salt to exist.” He criticized SADC for its inability to enforce democratic standards consistently across its member states, pointing out the discrepancy between the organization’s stated values and the political realities on the ground.
Sibanda also addressed the broader issue of how some countries within the region have resorted to revolutionary methods to challenge the status quo. He noted that such actions are often condemned for inciting violence. However, he argued that in times of severe oppression and lack of genuine democratic change, a revolution might be the necessary path to achieving peace and justice. “I’m of the belief that ‘a revolution’ at difficult times causes ‘peace,’” Sibanda asserted, drawing attention to the drastic measures that might be required to instigate meaningful transformation within SADC countries.
The senator did not mince words when expressing his skepticism about SADC’s ability to self-correct. He warned that without significant and decisive actions, the organization would fail to bring about the change needed. Instead, he suggested that the “toiling citizenry” might be the force that drives change through revolutionary means. Sibanda’s remarks confirms a growing frustration among citizens and some political leaders with SADC’s perceived inaction and lack of accountability.
“It’s mockery of citizens’ intelligence to believe what this body is doing against its inhabitants,” Sibanda concluded, stressing a deep-seated disillusionment with SADC’s effectiveness and relevance. His statements serve as a harsh reminder that for many in the region, SADC’s promises of democracy and good governance remain unfulfilled.
As the regional body faces increasing scrutiny, the question remains: will SADC take the necessary steps to restore faith in its commitment to democracy, or will the calls for revolutionary change grow louder?
